Early dating of revelation who is keke wyatt dating
Thus, Revelation serves to encourage to Christians facing their first major (non-localized) persecution that the Messiah will be victorious over their enemies. But with your knowledge about the subject I love to hear you try to step back from your own opinion (which in fact is the same as mine).
However, it also warns them of persecution for keeping the faith. But maybe you can't see any strengths with the early dating at all? I can't give you more then the 1 I already given.
For that was seen no very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian's reign." Pages 141-142.
A more natural approach, however, is to begin the list of kings with Julius Caesar, as was the custom of ancient historians such as Josephus and Suetonius, as well as Dio Cassius. If he is the king referred to in Revelation in the present tense, then this adds considerable weight to the argument for dating the book in the mid-to late-sixties. Which was the first emperor to persecute Christians?
If the book was written in the final decade of the first century (the traditional view), then its prophecies probably do not concern the destruction of Jerusalem, an event that would have already taken place. As the word suggests, external evidence looks to material apart from and outside the book itself, such as the testimony of ancient writers or citations, quotes, or allusions from other writers, and so forth. Gentry canvasses other internal evidence for an early date of Revelation, such as the question of emperor worship, the role of Jewish Christianity, the looming Jewish war, and the role of Nero. Irenaeus's credibility is enhanced, not only by his important defense of the faith, but also by his claim to be a personal acquaintance of Polycarp, who in turn had known the Apostle John himself.
On the other hand, if Revelation was written before A. 70, then a case could be made that it describes chiefly those events leading up to Jerusalem's fall. "My confident conviction," concludes Gentry, "is that a solid case for a Neronic date for Revelation can be set forth from the available evidences, both internal and external. Irenaeous referred to Revelation in a work he wrote near the end of the second century, probably between A. Irenaeus's testimony regarding Revelation is found in book 5 of his famous work Against Heresies.
When questions of dating biblical books arise, one must consider two main kinds of evidence: external and internal.
The first emperor to persecute Christians was Nero to whom Paul appealed his conviction.This man felt Jesus died at over fifty years of age instead of 33.His name is Irenaeus who lived from "We therefore do not run the risk of pronouncing positively concerning the name of the Antichrist [hidden in the number 666 in Rev.], for if it were necessary to have his name distinctly announced at the present time, it would doubtless have been announced by him who saw the apocalypse; for Irenaeus said this traditional idea was passed down to him by word of mouth from his youth.Traditionally, the book of Revelation has been dated near the end of the first century, around A. James Orr has observed, however, that recent criticism has reverted to the traditional date of near A. In view of some of the bizarre theories that have surfaced in recent times (e.g., the notion that all end-time prophecies were fulfilled with the fall of Jerusalem in A. 70), which are dependent upon the preterist interpretation, we offer the following. 180), a student of Polycarp (who was a disciple of the apostle John), wrote that the apocalyptic vision “was seen not very long ago, almost in our own generation, at the close of the reign of Domitian” (Against Heresies 30). 155-215) says that John returned from the isle of Patmos “after the tyrant was dead” (.23). Some writers, however, have advanced the preterist (from a Latin word meaning “that which is past”) view, contending that the Apocalypse was penned around A. 68 or 69, and thus the thrust of the book is supposed to relate to the impending destruction of Jerusalem (A. Wallace Jr.), and for a brief time it was popular with certain scholars. In fact, the evidence for the later date is extremely strong.